Skip to main content

Huff v. State

Citations

  • 698 N.W.2d 430
  • 2005 Minn. LEXIS 376
  • 2005 WL 1529849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying an abuse of discretion standard to a district court’s ruling on the admissibility of prior crimes evidence
  • determining that the exclusion of cumulative evidence was not prejudicial
  • affirming a district court’s decision to exclude evidence that an alleged alternative perpetrator murdered a different person, but not the victim, because the murders were dissimilar
  • discussing the parameters of reverse-Spreigl evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.