State of Minnesota v. Andrew Vernard Glover
Syllabus
1. The district court did not err in concluding that the police had probable cause to arrest appellant. 2. The district court did not clearly err in finding that the police did not materially misrepresent information in the application for a warrant to search appellant's residence. 3. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion to admit reverse-Spreigl evidence. 4. The district court did not violate appellant's confrontation rights by denying defense counsel's request to cross-examine the lead investigator about whether police had investigated unnamed suspects from a prior shooting of one of the victims. Affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- teachers may not limit or grade speech in the classroom “as a pretext for punishing the student for her . . . political persuasion”
- “The free speech rights of students in the classroom must be limited because effective education depends not only on controlling boisterous conduct, but also on maintaining the focus of the class on the assignment in question.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.