Skip to main content

Huebner v. State

Citations

  • 810 P.2d 1209
  • 107 Nev. 328
  • 1991 Nev. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating a notice of appeal as if it were filed on the date of submission
  • direct appeal reinstated where it was proved that clerk’s office’s practice was not to file notice of appeal on incoming day as required by law
  • clerk must create an accurate record of all pleadings submitted for filing, whether or not the documents are actually filed
  • petition for rehearing granted where appellant timely mailed notice of appeal but clerk did not date-stamp it received and did not file it until after applicable deadline expired; ambiguity as to date document received to be resolved in appellant’s favor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.