Skip to main content
· 11/1/1995

Sullivan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

Citations

  • 904 P.2d 1039
  • 111 Nev. 1367
  • 1995 Nev. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court clerk had a duty to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis and \receive\ a civil complaint
  • recognizing citizens’, whether or not indigent, constitutional right to access to the courts with the protection of due process of law
  • explaining that \Mills court has several times confirmed the absolute obligation of the district courts to file documents submitted to them\
  • vacating for overbreadth a restrictive order that purported to declare all of an individual’s filings “null and void”
  • addressing the district court clerk's \absolute obligation\ to receive and file documents submitted to them and collecting cases
  • providing that \a judge's law clerk lacks judicial authority\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.