Nebraska Supreme Court· 3/9/2001
State v. Hess
Citations
- 622 N.W.2d 891
- 261 Neb. 368
- 2001 Neb. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that presumption of regularity is afforded to clerks of court performing their official duties
- holding “we must presume, in the absence of affirmative evidence to the contrary, that the clerk performed his or her duty and endorsed the notice of appeal with the date it was in fact presented to him or her for filing”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GilliamNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-02-12· cited 226×
- State v. GalesNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-03-18· cited 200×
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-06-14· cited 132×
- State v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court· 2022-01-28· cited 110×
- State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-07-11· cited 108×
- Reents v. WoltemathNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-05-28· cited 93×
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-07-06· cited 68×
- State v. VeatchNebraska Court of Appeals· 2007-10-23· cited 66×
- State v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-12-15· cited 60×
- State v. Al-ZubaidyNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-04-05· cited 58×
- State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-07-28· cited 45×
- State v. CurtrightNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-01-04· cited 44×
- Nye v. Fire Group PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-04-19· cited 41×
- State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-06-22· cited 38×
- McClellan v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-05-02· cited 33×
- In re Interest of L.T.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-10-28· cited 30×
- State v. VOLCEKNebraska Court of Appeals· 2007-03-13· cited 21×
- State v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-06-18· cited 21×
- State v. ParmarNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-02-15· cited 19×
- State v. MeersNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-11-21· cited 16×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- State v. TrotterNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-04-14· cited 149×
- State v. ParmarNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-09-25· cited 124×
- State v. SoukharithNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 69×
- Bauers v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-11-20· cited 69×
- State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-01-07· cited 68×
- State v. LyleNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-12-03· cited 42×
- State v. LindsayNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-06-03· cited 40×
- State v. EnglemanNebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 36×
- State v. McDowellNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-10-14· cited 34×
- In Re Interest of WolkowNebraska Supreme Court· 1980-06-24· cited 32×
- State v. Larry D.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-03-12· cited 32×
- State v. SchroderNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-12-21· cited 28×
- Sherard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-12-17· cited 21×
- Ludwig v. Board of County Com'rs of Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court· 1960-06-24· cited 21×
- State v. McCroyNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-06-16· cited 21×
- State v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 19×
- Hammond v. CrabtreeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-03-20· cited 16×
- Crowell v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1873-07-01· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.