Texas Supreme Court· 6/25/1986

Hudson v. Wakefield

Citations

711 S.W.2d 628
29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 445
1986 Tex. LEXIS 551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when a summary judgment is reversed and remanded for trial, litigants are not restricted to the issues raised in the summary judgment proceeding
holding that when a summary judgment is reversed and remanded for trial, litigants are not restricted to the issues raised in the summary judgment proceeding
holding that if summary judgment is reversed and remanded, parties are not limited to theories asserted in original summary judgment at later trial on merits
holding that “law of the case” doctrine “only applies to questions of law and does not apply to questions of fact”
holding that if summary judgment is reversed and remanded, parties are not limited to theories asserted in original summary judgment at later trial on merits
holding that a trial court is restricted to determining only the issues within the limited remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gonzalez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

424 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hudson v. Wakefield

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.