Texas Supreme Court· 6/7/2013

Phillips v. Bramlett

Citations

407 S.W.3d 229
56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 635
2013 WL 2664056
2013 Tex. LEXIS 440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, although not expressly stated, unchallenged portion of court of appeals’ judgment was not reversed
concluding that the Legislature selected a term “for the purpose of conveying a meaning consistent with that which we historically afforded to it”
observing that “[w]hen the life cycle of a judgment extends beyond an initial appeal, courts often face unique or unsettled jurisdictional and procedural issues”
explaining that the courts of appeal have jurisdiction to review final judgment from trial courts located within their respective districts
construing “date the judgment is rendered” as mentioned in section 304.005 of Finance Code
construing “date the judgment is rendered” as mentioned in section 304.005 of Finance Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.