Saudi v. Brieven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that common-interest qualified privilege applied to defamatory statements made 50 during meeting and phone call between representatives of three companies because there was “[an] interlocking business relationship” among them
• explaining that privilege does not apply if information is furnished to others, not sharing common interest
• noting that the qualified privilege does not apply if the information is furnished to others that do not share the common interest
• setting out qualified privilege to make statement in good faith on subject matter in which speaker has common interest with other person
• setting out qualified privilege to make statement in good faith on subject matter in which speaker has common interest with other person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).