Honea v. Honea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party cannot sit back at trial without offering proof, then complain to this Court of the insufficiency of the evidence
• holding that a party cannot “sit back at trial without offering proof, then come to this Court complaining of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the family court’s findings”
• stating the burden is on appellant to show the family court committed reversible error and a party cannot sit back at trial without offering proof, then come to the appellate court complaining of the insufficiency of evidence to support the family court’s findings
• explaining the burden is on appellant to show the family court committed reversible error, and a party cannot sit back at trial without offering proof, then come to the appellate court complaining of the insufficiency of evidence to support the family court’s findings
• “[A] party cannot sit back at trial without offering proof, then come to this Court complaining of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the family court’s findings.”
• a party cannot fail to offer any proof at trial and then come to this Court complaining of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the court’s findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).