Hubbard v. Wansley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment on malpractice claim for a failure of proof on an essential element of the claim
• “where a layman [juror] can observe and understand the negligence as a matter of common sense and practical experience expert testimony is not necessary,”
• “It is illogical to allow a proposed expert to testify as to the standard of care of a specialty with which he has demonstrated no familiarity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).