Hardy v. Brantley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Hinds General Hospital liable for negligence of emergency room staff because the hospital placed emergency room physicians in position which induced public to rely upon hospital
• imputation of physician's negligence to professional corporation does not have effect of requiring corporation to engage in practice of medicine
• in a discussion which the Court stated to be consistent with proposed Rule 702
• in a discussion which the Court stated to be consistent with proposed Rule 702
• where a hospital held itself out to the public as providing emergency services and so was vicariously liable even though under the contract, the emergency room physicians may be independent contractors
• in a discussion which the Court stated to be consistent with proposed Rule 702

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).