Walker by and Through Walker v. Skiwski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant-physician was entitled to summary judgment where he filed three affidavits, one of which was his own self-serving affidavit that he complied with the standard of care
• finding that listing expert witnesses in interrogatory responses without providing any sworn testimony from these experts was the “fatal deficiency in [the plaintiffs’] opposition to summary judgment”
• \Our general rule is that the negligence of a physician may be established only by expert medical testimony.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).