Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 9/16/1994

Howell v. State

Citations

882 P.2d 1086
1994 OK CR 62
1994 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 70
1994 WL 503286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

this Court rejected appellant's argument that under Tibbetts juror's deliberate withholding of pertinent information was not consistent with the principles of fundamental fairness
this Court rejected appellant’s argument that under Tibbetts juror’s deliberate withholding of pertinent information was not consistent with the principles of fundamental fairness
\We recognize that a preliminary hearing serves a more limited function than does a trial and that the right of confrontation is basically a trial right.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Lumpkin, Lane, Chapel'S, Chapel, Strubhar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.