Tennessee Supreme Court· 4/11/2011

Coleman v. State

Citations

341 S.W.3d 221
2011 WL 13176043
2011 Tenn. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning courts “must be circumspect about adding words to a statute.”
“Just as we may not overlook or ignore any of the words in a statute, we must be circumspect about adding words to a statute that the General Assembly did not place there.” (internal citations omitted)
Courts “must be circumspect about adding words to a statute.”
discussing presentation of evidence of “malingering”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Holder, Koch, Lee, Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.