Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 697 So. 2d 415
  • 1997 WL 362119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding unreliable and inadmissible bite mark comparisons of bites in living flesh, further holding that all bite mark evidence must be open to wide-ranging attack by defense counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.