Skip to main content

House v. State

Citations

  • 909 S.W.2d 214
  • 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 2375
  • 1995 WL 571826

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that defendant did not preserve complaint where he did not object until after question was answered and where witness later answered similar questions without objection
  • stating any error in allowing inadmissible evidence is cured when the same evidence comes in without objection elsewhere in trial
  • stating any error in allowing inadmissible evidence is cured when same evidence comes in without objection elsewhere in trial
  • stating any error in allowing inadmissible evidence is cured when same evidence comes in without objection elsewhere in trial
  • stating any error in allowing inadmissible evidence is cured when same evidence comes in without objection elsewhere in trial
  • “A reputation witness’[s] testimony must be based on discussion with others about the defendant, or on hearing others discuss the defendant’s reputation, and not just on personal knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee, Amidei, Edelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.