Skip to main content
· 4/22/1998

Hotelera Naco, Inc. v. Chinea

Citations

  • 708 So. 2d 961
  • 1998 WL 65264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where no clear legislative intent exists, a substantive statute is presumed to operate prospectively
  • holding that where no clear legislative intent exists, a substantive statute is presumed to operate prospectively
  • report offered to prove employer’s state of mind in deciding to terminate an employee is not offered for their truth and is not inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Jorgenson and Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.