Skip to main content

Horton v. Meskill

Citations

  • 187 Conn. 187
  • 445 A.2d 579
  • 1982 Conn. LEXIS 513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that there are “cases which make clear that intervention of right exists in Connecticut practice,” citing Ricard v. Stanadyne, Inc., 181 Conn. 321, 435 A.2d 352 [1980]
  • towns properly barred from intervening in action challenging constitutionality of school financing scheme because attorney general defending statute
  • towns properly barred from intervening in action challenging constitutionality of school financing scheme because attorney general defending statute
  • “[w]here state precedent is lacking, it is appropriate to look to authorities under the comparable federal [statute]”
  • where state precedent is lacking, it is appropriate to look to authorities under comparable federal statute
  • “[w]here state precedent is lacking, it is appropriate to look to authorities under the comparable federal rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Speziale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.