Skip to main content
· 4/5/1966

Nikitiuk v. Pishtey

Citations

  • 153 Conn. 545
  • 219 A.2d 225
  • 1966 Conn. LEXIS 559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where existence of a fact is necessary for a party to succeed, he must ordinarily prove it.
  • “Since the plaintiffs have not taken an appeal from the [probate court’s] 1959 decree, the decree was conclusive as to all relevant matters embraced therein.”
  • “[i]t is an elementary rule that whenever the existence of any fact is necessary in order that a party may make out his case or establish his defense, the burden is on such party to show the existence of such fact” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcorn, House, King, Murphy, Shannon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.