Skip to main content
· 9/23/2002

Horn v. Welch

Citations

  • 2002 WY 138
  • 54 P.3d 754
  • 2002 WL 31108928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding punishment for a civil contempt \serves only the purposes of the complainant\
  • reversing for failure to comply with W.R.Cr.P. 42 contempt and W.R.C.P. 11 sanction procedures
  • declining to decide whether the appellant had been held in direct or indirect contempt after finding the contempt order could not stand because the district court failed to follow the proper procedures set forth in W.R.Cr.P. 42
  • decided under the old rule, W.R.Cr.P. 41

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, C.J., and Golden, Lehman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.