Skip to main content
· 1/13/2003

Metz v. Metz

Citations

  • 2003 WY 3
  • 61 P.3d 383
  • 2003 WL 102500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing we afford “the prevailing party every favorable inference while omitting any consideration of evidence presented by the unsuccessful party.”
  • recognizing the Court does not disturb a property division in a divorce except on clear grounds, because “the trial court is usually in a better position than the appellate court to judge the parties’ needs and the merits of their positions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Golden, Lehman, Kite, Voigt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.