· 1/13/2003
Metz v. Metz
Citations
- 2003 WY 3
- 61 P.3d 383
- 2003 WL 102500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing we afford “the prevailing party every favorable inference while omitting any consideration of evidence presented by the unsuccessful party.”
- recognizing the Court does not disturb a property division in a divorce except on clear grounds, because “the trial court is usually in a better position than the appellate court to judge the parties’ needs and the merits of their positions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Golden, Lehman, Kite, Voigt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.