Idaho Supreme Court· 6/26/1973
Hooker v. Hooker
Citations
- 511 P.2d 800
- 95 Idaho 518
- 1973 Ida. LEXIS 304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- first reported Idaho transmutation case — \isolated testimony” was sufficient to create \substantial conflict” in evidence upon which trial court could find no intent to transmute
- first reported Idaho transmutation case \isolated testimony\ was sufficient to create \substantial conflict\ in evidence upon which trial court could find no intent to transmute
- “[T]he burden of showing the right to reimbursement of the community rests with the party trying to establish or benefit by such reimbursement. . . .”
- “[T]he burden of showing the right to reimbursement of the community rests with the party trying to establish or benefit by such reimbursement. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bakes, McQuade, McFadden, Donaldson, Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Suter v. SuterIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-02-26· cited 63×
- Hoskinson v. HoskinsonIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-11-21· cited 45×
- Martsch v. MartschIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-04-16· cited 32×
- Shumway v. ShumwayIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-03-29· cited 32×
- Winn v. WinnIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-12-08· cited 30×
- Cook v. CookIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-10-07· cited 29×
- Maslen v. MaslenIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 23×
- Wood v. WoodIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-06-25· cited 21×
- Bliss v. BlissIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 20×
- Suchan v. SuchanIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-07-14· cited 17×
- Wolford v. WolfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-01-15· cited 16×
- In Re Estate of CookeIdaho Supreme Court· 1974-07-08· cited 16×
- Griffin v. GriffinIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-03-16· cited 16×
- Greene v. CookeIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-12-17· cited 12×
- United States v. Itt Consumer Financial Corporation, and Aetna Finance Company, Delaware CorporationsNinth Circuit· 1987-05-05· cited 11×
- Houska v. HouskaIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-12-17· cited 9×
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-06-18· cited 7×
- In Re MartellD. Idaho· 2005-04-12· cited 6×
- Robirds v. RobirdsIdaho Supreme Court· 2021-11-26· cited 6×
- Matter of Estate of AsheIdaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-09· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Woods v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-06-28· cited 68×
- Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-05-20· cited 38×
- Loveland v. LovelandIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-01-05· cited 31×
- Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-05-22· cited 30×
- Brammer v. BrammerIdaho Supreme Court· 1970-06-26· cited 25×
- Neeley v. LocktonWashington Supreme Court· 1964-03-05· cited 21×
- Hiatt v. HiattIdaho Supreme Court· 1971-08-09· cited 19×
- Hammond v. HammondIdaho Supreme Court· 1968-12-12· cited 17×
- Davis v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court· 1960-06-29· cited 14×
- Tilton v. TiltonIdaho Supreme Court· 1963-01-25· cited 12×
- Winn v. WinnNevada Supreme Court· 1970-01-16· cited 11×
- In Re Estate of SimsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-10-15· cited 9×
- Williams v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.