Skip to main content
· 4/15/1856

Hooker v. Hooker

Citations

  • 31 Miss. 448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the special errand doctrine was inapplicable when a school principal was not “required” to attend a football game, and his trip home was not part of any service for his employer
  • the special errand doctrine was inapplicable when a school principal was not \required\ to attend a football game, and his trip home was not part of any service for his employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.