Skip to main content

Hood v. Fulkerson

Citations

  • 699 P.2d 608
  • 102 N.M. 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that duplication of damages or double recovery is impermissible
  • discussing election of damages when claim for substandard services has been brought and proved under theories of negligence and breach of contract
  • “The courts of New Mexico do not distinguish between tort and contract in the application of punitive damages.”
  • “The general theory of damages is to make the injured party whole.” (citation omitted)
  • “Duplication of damages or double recovery for injuries received is not permissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Federici, Stowers, Walters, Riordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.