McGinnis v. Honeywell, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a disclaimer in a supervisor’s manual was not dispositive on the issue of whether the manual modified an express employment contract
• recognizing that where actual damages and mitigation of damages are concerned, a jury must not be asked to speculate on matters that should have been presented in the form of evidence
• recognizing that where actual damages and mitigation of damages are concerned, a jury must not be asked to speculate on matters that should have been presented in the form of evidence
• stating that it was obvious to the Supreme Court of New Mexico that the parties had an express contract
• finding that the express employment agreement entered into at the beginning of a plaintiffs employment relationship with an employer provided the terms that governed the employee’s employment
• noting that an express contract included the terms of personnel policies and practices published to employees, and thus the employee’s at-wjll employment could only be terminated in accordance with those policies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).