C.E. Alexander & Sons, Inc. v. DEC International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the test of indispensability of a party is not a jurisdictional one
• holding that the test of indispensability of a party is not a jurisdictional one
• stating that Rule 1-019 motion may even be raised for first time on appeal
• noting appellate court determines if substantial evidence exists to support verdict after viewing facts most favorable to appellee
• analyzing under NMRA 1-019 a claim that an indispensable party’s absence deprived the trial court of jurisdiction
• stating that when a party had ample 4 opportunity to bring the issue before the district court, but did not do so, and then 5 seeks to obtain a technical escape from an adverse judgment, the issue is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).