Holloman v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert should have been permitted to testify on effect of mental retardation on ability to understand, communicate
• evidence that defendant was prone to manipulation, suggestion, and intimidation because of his mental retardation \should not have been excluded on the basis of relevancy because it was permissible evidence bearing directly on the reliability of his statements.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beaty v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-10-23· cited 97×
• State v. Oliver
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-16· cited 42×
• Parrish v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2008-09-18· cited 37×
• Rogers v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-10-03· cited 37×
• McBeath v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2008-02-21· cited 12×
• Tunstull v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2011-04-21· cited 11×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Colorado v. Connelly
  Supreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
• Donnelly v. DeChristoforo
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
• Crane v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
• Commonwealth v. English
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 1,274×
• Abernathy v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1969-02-28· cited 125×
• Mabe v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 82×
• Anastasi v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 71×
• Hall v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 37×
• Lear v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 29×
• White v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1980-11-14· cited 11×