Skip to main content
· 2/21/2008

McBeath v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 244 S.W.3d 22
  • 2007 WL 4465073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it is not necessary to have quid pro quo understanding in order to find agency
  • finding that incriminating information was deliberately elicited as jailhouse informant working with detectives asked defendant questions likely to elicit incriminating responses and used interrogation techniques to prompt confession through emotional manipulation
  • finding agency relationship when informant “was told to report back what was said in [the defendant’s] exact words. This informed [the informant] that the police wanted more information about the crime and induced him to obtain that information[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.