Skip to main content
D. Massachusetts· 3/23/2017

Holloman v. Clarke

Citations

  • 244 F. Supp. 3d 223
  • 2017 WL 1098818
  • 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the loss of contact visitations as a disciplinary action does not violate the right to due process
  • concluding that equitable tolling did not apply where petitioner’s “ability to file pleadings pro se in his criminal case even with assistance of a friend supports defendants’ asserts that he maintained the capacity, if limited, to manage his legal affairs”
  • no constitutionally protected interest in grievance procedure regardless if sufficient process was supplied in disciplinary proceedings
  • “courts may strike pleadings that include inadmissible hearsay or lack of personal knowledge under Rule 12(f).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.