Norman Z. Flick v. Julie W. Alba and Peter M. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the federal grievance regulations providing for an administrative remedy procedure do not a create liberty interest in access to that procedure.”
• noting that, although prisoners have federal constitutional rights to 17 petition the government for redress of grievances and access to the courts, those rights are 18 “not compromised by the prison’s refusal to entertain his grievance”
• noting that although prisoners have a First Amendment right to petition 8 the government for redress of grievances and access to the courts, those rights are “not 9 compromised by the prison’s refusal to entertain his grievance.”
• noting that although prisoners have a First Amendment right to petition the 5 government for redress of grievances and access to the courts, those rights are “not 6 compromised by the prison’s refusal to entertain his grievance.”
• noting that although prisoners have a federal constitutional right to petition the 28 government for redress of grievances and access to the courts, those rights are “not 1 compromised by the prison’s refusal to entertain his grievance.”
• noting that although prisoners have 6 federal constitutional rights to petition the government for redress of grievances and of 7 access to the courts, those rights are “not compromised by the prison’s refusal to entertain 8 his grievance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).