Skip to main content

Hollander v. Lubow

Citations

  • 351 A.2d 421
  • 277 Md. 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that repeated phone calls may give rise to an intrusion upon seclusion claim
  • noting that repeated phone calls may give rise to an intrusion upon seclusion claim
  • summary judgment can be entered in favor of all the defendants even when a motion was made by only one of them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.