New Summit Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Nistle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the court found compensable emotional distress based on objective evidence of insomnia, diarrhea, and nausea, as a result of the tortious conduct
• “[P]laintiff was not required to prove that a particular individual actually observed her” through peephole
• absent evidence named defendants, or their agents, actually participated in observation through mirror in plaintiffs apartment bathroom, there was no basis for claim for intentional intrusion upon seclusion against those.defendants
• absent evidence named defendants, or their agents, actually participated in observation through mirror in plaintiff's apartment bathroom, there was no basis for claim for intentional intrusion upon seclusion against those defendants
• “The intentional act that exposed that private place intruded upon appellee’s seclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).