Hogle v. Hogle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Hoy in favor of other authorities holding that a QDRO is an appropriate mechanism for enforcing support arrearages
• “Since ERISA does not provide an enforcement mechanism for collecting judgments, state law methods for collecting money generally remain undisturbed by ERISA.”
• “It is well- established that, under certain circumstances, a pension may be attached or garnished as a means of satisfying a support arrearage.”
• “It is well- established that, under certain circumstances, a pension may be attached or garnished as a means of satisfying a support arrearage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Marriage of Drexler
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-03-28· cited 30×
• Torres v. Torres
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-01-06· cited 22×
• Potts v. Potts
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-01· cited 13×
• Katherine Ryan v. Larry Janovsky
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-12-05· cited 11×
• Stiel v. Stiel
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-03-16· cited 9×
• Linda Kesting v. James Kesting
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2016-03-23· cited 6×
• Cook v. Bricklayers Local Union 19 of Indiana Retirement Plan
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-04-14
• Smith v. Rice
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2004-07-09
• Jill Finfrock a/k/a Jill Bastone v. Mark Finfrock
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-05-29
• Bart Dalton v. Carol Dalton
  Texas Supreme Court· 2018-06-29
• Jeffery Thomas Maxwell v. Shirley Sue Maxwell (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-08-10
• John Lind v. Nancy (Lind) Mullen (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-02-20

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 1,042×
• Rohrbeck v. Rohrbeck
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-06· cited 173×
• Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rose Marie Wheaton, and Douglas Wheaton and Daniel Wheaton
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-12-14· cited 78×
• Ablamis v. Roper
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-07-03· cited 70×
• Brosamer v. Mark
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-01· cited 41×
• Pitman v. Pitman
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-10-14· cited 40×
• Baird v. Baird
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-12-15· cited 27×
• Stinner v. Stinner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-08· cited 26×
• Von Haden v. Supervised Estate of Von Haden
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-08-12· cited 18×
• DeSantis v. DeSantis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-29· cited 17×
• In Re Marriage of Bruns
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1995-05-30· cited 13×
• In Re Marriage of Williams
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-01-17· cited 11×
• In Re the Marriage of Rife
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1995-03-29· cited 9×
• Bowles v. Bowles
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-12-13· cited 8×
• Hoy v. Hoy
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-02-02· cited 7×