Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/8/1989
Stinner v. Stinner
Citations
- 554 A.2d 45
- 520 Pa. 374
- 10 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1972
- 79 A.L.R. 4th 1071
- 1989 Pa. LEXIS 30
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ERISA’s anti-alienation provision did not invalidate an order garnishing the former husband’s ERISA benefits to satisfy an alimony arrearage
- holding that a QDRO may be entered to enforce a judgment for breach of an alimony agreement
- holding that a QDRO may be entered to enforce a judgment for breach of an alimony agreement
- holding that a QDRO may be entered to enforce a judgment for breach of an alimony agreement
- holding that ERISA's anti-alienation provision did not invalidate an order garnishing the former husband's ERISA benefits to satisfy an alimony arrearage
- noting that the judgment for past-due alimony that the wife was attempting to enforce by garnishing the husband's pension was \made pursuant to the decisional domestic relations law of Pennsylvania\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shirley W. Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Company Profit Sharing Plan, Thomas A. Carpenter, Thorpe Holding CompanyNinth Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 60×
- Sinaiko v. SinaikoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-24· cited 60×
- In Re Marriage of ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-05-05· cited 18×
- Hogle v. HogleIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-08-15· cited 16×
- Roberts v. BaughE.D. Michigan· 1997-10-20· cited 13×
- In Re the Marriage of LeBlancColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-09-04· cited 9×
- Linda Kesting v. James KestingIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-03-23· cited 6×
- State Treasurer v. AbbottMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-03-19· cited 5×
- Jago, G. v. Jago, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-08-19· cited 5×
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-12-03· cited 2×
- Smith v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2004-07-09
- Bart Dalton v. Carol DaltonTexas Supreme Court· 2018-06-29
- Reineke v. ReinekeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-17
- Mary Kathryn C. Wallace v. Kristin W. WildenseeSupreme Court of Iowa· 2023-05-05
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. MerrySecond Circuit· 1979-01-29· cited 70×
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-15· cited 54×
- Cody v. RieckerE.D. New York· 1978-07-05· cited 42×
- Hopkinson v. HopkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-06· cited 40×
- Hollman v. HollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-09· cited 16×
- Lurie v. LurieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 13×
- Stinner v. StinnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-11-30· cited 5×
- Stinner v. StinnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.