Skip to main content

Stinner v. Stinner

Citations

  • 554 A.2d 45
  • 520 Pa. 374
  • 10 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1972
  • 79 A.L.R. 4th 1071
  • 1989 Pa. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ERISA’s anti-alienation provision did not invalidate an order garnishing the former husband’s ERISA benefits to satisfy an alimony arrearage
  • holding that a QDRO may be entered to enforce a judgment for breach of an alimony agreement
  • holding that a QDRO may be entered to enforce a judgment for breach of an alimony agreement
  • holding that a QDRO may be entered to enforce a judgment for breach of an alimony agreement
  • holding that ERISA's anti-alienation provision did not invalidate an order garnishing the former husband's ERISA benefits to satisfy an alimony arrearage
  • noting that the judgment for past-due alimony that the wife was attempting to enforce by garnishing the husband's pension was \made pursuant to the decisional domestic relations law of Pennsylvania\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.