Murphy v. Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that service in accor- dance with the relevant rules and statutes is itself a “sub- stantial right” for purposes of ORCP 12 B
• rejecting argument that due to actual notice no substantial right was affected
• “[Without restricted delivery] anyone at that address—a roommate, a neighbor, defendant’s landlord—could have signed for the receipt . . . with no assurances that the defendant would ever see the papers.”
• right to receive adequate service of summons as defined by ORCP 7 and its case law is a “substantial right” for purposes of ORCP 12 B; actual notice was insufficient to excuse noncompliance with ORCP 7

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).