· 6/25/1999
Hobson v. Raychem Corp.
Citations
- 86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 497
- 73 Cal. App. 4th 614
- 64 Cal. Comp. Cases 872
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5665
- 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1017
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 7191
- 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that employee opposing a summary-judgment motion who offered evidence of “only minor limitations” but not of substantial limitations, did not have a physical disability under FEHA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lambden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.