Skip to main content
· 11/14/2000

Diffey v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department

Citations

  • 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 353
  • 84 Cal. App. 4th 1031
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9132
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 12095
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that applicant for deputy sheriff who was unable to see the color red was not substantially limited in life activity of working, and, therefore, was not physically disabled under FEHA
  • “Although Diffey’s sight certainly was affected by his color deficiency, his ‘seeing’ was not substantially limited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gaut

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.