Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing an administrative history in which the claimant attempted to sue based on “theories of sexual discrimination, 28 harassment and retaliation” that were never formally presented to DFEH
• “an EEOC right-to-sue notice satisfies the requirement of exhaustion of administrative remedies only for purposes of an action based on Title VII”
• “[A]n 7 EEOC right-to-sue notice satisfies the requirement of exhaustion of administrative 8 remedies only for purposes of an action based on Title VII.”
• “The timely filing of an administrative complaint is a prerequisite to the 23 bringing of a civil action for damages under the FEHA.”
• “A defendant seeking summary 16 judgment must bear the initial burden of showing that the action has no merit, and the plaintiff will not 17 be required to respond unless and until the defendant has borne that burden”
• “A defendant seeking summary judgment must 10 bear the initial burden of showing that the action has no merit, and the plaintiff will not be required to 11 respond unless and until the defendant has borne that burden”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2000-10-05· cited 1,654×
• Morgan v. Regents of the University of California
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-11-30· cited 324×
• Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1996-12-16· cited 321×
• Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State University
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-08-31· cited 279×
• Serri v. Santa Clara University
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-05-28· cited 243×
• Hersant v. Department of Social Services
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-09-18· cited 212×
• Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-08-13· cited 186×
• Sangster v. Paetkau
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-10-30· cited 182×
• Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-03-25· cited 139×
• Horn v. Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-05-06· cited 138×
• Robert Rodriguez v. Airborne Express
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-12· cited 134×
• Loggins v. Kaiser Permanente International
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-14· cited 132×
• Caldwell v. Paramount Unified School District
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-12-20· cited 131×
• Couveau v. American Airlines, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-07-17· cited 104×
• Soria v. Univision Radio Los Angeles, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-11-15· cited 101×
• Sada v. Robert F. Kennedy Medical Center
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-07-01· cited 92×
• McGrory v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-01-24· cited 92×
• Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2015-07-14· cited 87×
• ELSENBERG v. Alameda Newspapers, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-09-20· cited 86×
• Cucuzza v. City of Santa Clara
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-12-23· cited 81×

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
• Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
• St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
• International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
• Love v. Pullman Co.
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-17· cited 798×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.
  Supreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 443×
• Rojo v. Kliger
  California Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 364×
• AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-04-11· cited 261×
• Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1982-08-30· cited 205×
• Yurick v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-04-21· cited 87×
• Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-11-25· cited 75×
• University of Southern California v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-08-10· cited 46×
• Burton v. Security Pacific Nat. Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-01-19· cited 42×
• Clutterham v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-07-12· cited 37×
• Miller v. United Airlines, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-06-21· cited 31×
• Parsons Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-06-08· cited 31×
• Ibarbia v. Regents of University of California
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-05-15· cited 28×
• Denney v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-11-04· cited 24×
• Ewing v. Gill Industries, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-01-15· cited 21×
• Gonzales v. MetPath, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-09-28· cited 16×