RAMOS (GUSTAVO) v. STATE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when interpreting a statute, the appellate courts first look to the statute's plain language to determine its meaning and will enforce it as written if the language is clear and unambiguous
• stating that when interpreting a statute, the appellate courts first look to the statute's plain language to determine its meaning and will enforce it as written if the language is clear and unambiguous
• \We will look beyond the statute's language only if that language . . . would lead to an absurd or unreasonable result.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• SOLDO-ALLESIO v. FERGUSON
  Court of Appeals of Nevada· 2025-02-13· cited 3×
• Bolden v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2023-10-19
• Aldape v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2023-09-28
• Bolden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Nevada· 2023-10-19
• Willson v. First Jud. Dist. Ct.
  Court of Appeals of Nevada· 2024-02-08
• SILVANUS (DAMIEN) v. STATE (CRIMINAL)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2026-02-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lucero
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 79×
• Hobbs v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2011-05-19· cited 72×
• Sheriff v. Burcham
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-12-24· cited 27×
• Houtz v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 8×
• Bailey v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-06-15· cited 8×