Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 8/26/2002

Hitt v. Connell

Citations

  • 301 F.3d 240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the admission of evidence that a supervisor discriminated against third parties 7 was probative to motive and did not run afoul of Fed. R. Evid. 403
  • affirming the trial court's admission of audio recordings where \[b]oth deputies who recorded [the] statements testified about how they made the recordings\
  • union association must have been “a substantial or motivating factor” in adverse action (citations omitted)
  • union-association claim requires showing: (1) plaintiff suffered adverse employment action; (2) plaintiff’s associational interest outweighed government’s efficiency interest; and (3) association was “a substantial or motivating factor” in adverse action (citations omitted)
  • District Court did not err in allowing non-party employees to testify about the employer’s discrimination and retaliation against them because such testimony was relevant to the plaintiff proving the employer’s motive in discharging him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Garza, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hitt v. Connell

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.