Alaniz v. Zamora-Quezada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the workplace must be “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult, that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment”
• “A workplace environment is hostile when it is ‘permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult, that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment.’”
• “Improper argument may be the basis for a new trial where no objection has been raised only where the interest of substantial justice is at stake.” (alteration adopted) (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).