Skip to main content

Hillard v. State

Citations

  • 53 So. 3d 165
  • 2010 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 42
  • 2010 WL 2148535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a codefendant's statement to police was inadmissible hearsay under Rule 802, Ala. R. Evid.
  • holding that a codefendant's statement to police was inadmissible hearsay under Rule 802, Ala. R. Evid.
  • holding that a codefendant’s statement to police was inadmissible hearsay under Rule 802, Ala. R. Evid.
  • holding that a codefendant's statement to police was inadmissible hearsay under Rule 802, Ala. R. Evid.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kellum, Main, Welch, Windom, Wise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.