Ephraim v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, inter alia, that, prior to closing arguments, “nothing ha[s] occurred in the presence of the jury after the defense [has] rested its case,” in contrast to “situations where closing arguments ha[ve] been made before the defendant reassert[s] his right to testify”
• \[a] co-conspirator's act or statement after the commission of the crime ordinarily is not admissible against the accused\
• “[a] co-conspirator’s act or statement after the commission of the crime ordinarily is not admissible against the accused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).