Callahan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “neither the [Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986] nor Hoffman mandates denying awards of lost wages or medical expenses to undocumented immigrant employees solely because of their immigration status”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Callahan
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-01-23· cited 3×
• Noe Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-03-31· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-03· cited 44×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-03-09· cited 25×
• Hudgins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-05· cited 23×
• Simms v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-01-08· cited 15×
• Costa v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-11· cited 11×
• Hillard v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-06· cited 8×
• Nimon v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-10· cited 5×
• Phelps v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-03-28· cited 5×
• Edwards v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-10· cited 2×