Hill v. United Public Workers Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing third amended complaint where plaintiff's case “depend[ed] on an unsustainable construction” of the asserted claims that rendered “any [further] amendment .. . futile’
• explaining that “pleading on information and belief” is “permit[ted]”
• \[F]actual allegations that do not permit a court to infer that the accused product infringes each element of at least one claim are not suggestive of infringement-they are merely compatible with infringement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).