Skip to main content
· 2/27/1912

Saulsberry v. Coopers International Union

Citations

  • 147 Ky. 170
  • 143 S.W. 1018
  • 1912 Ky. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding predetermined nature of the hearing a “close case” where record suggested that decisionmakers wanted to eliminate plaintiff’s job in order to create a new position for somebody else
  • fact that person who made original decision to terminate employee also served as appointing authority, hearing officer and fact witness insufficient to demonstrate adjudicator was partial
  • fact that person who made original decision to terminate employee also served as appointing authority, hearing officer and fact witness insufficient to demonstrate adjudicator was partial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lassing, Whole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.