Piercy v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he [district] [c]ourt had an independent obligation to consider the evidence in the record and assess whether the proposed class met the Rule 23(a) requirements.” (citing Teamsters Loc. 445 Freight Div. Pension Fund v. Bombardier Inc., 546 F.3d 196, 202 (2d Cir. 2008))
• “[T]he [district] [c]ourt had an independent obligation to consider the evidence in the record and assess whether the proposed class met the Rule 23(a) requirements.” (citing Teamsters Loc. 445 Freight Div. Pension Fund v. Bombardier Inc., 546 F.3d 196, 202 (2d Cir. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).