Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could find restraint was incidental to robbery when perpetrators merely forced victims to lie down on floor before escaping
• “If [the defendant’s] contention is true that the movement or confinement of the victims was slight, inconsequential and merely incidental to the robbery, there may have existed no factual basis for the plea entered on the armed kidnapping charges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Banks v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-05-12· cited 13×
• Peterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-24
• Patak v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-06-23· cited 239×
• Faison v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-02-10· cited 228×
• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-06· cited 88×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-10· cited 47×
• Costello v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1972-03-01· cited 45×
• Suarez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-06· cited 17×
• Gust v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-28· cited 11×
• Grant v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-06-25· cited 7×