Skip to main content
· 6/2/1995

Wayne Kieser v. The People of the State of New York

Citations

  • 56 F.3d 16
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13650
  • 1995 WL 329623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “placing funds with Oppenheimer for 18 investment” created a “customer” relationship under the predecessor rule to 17 1 FINRA Rule 12200
  • observing 5 that our Court “was careful to limit the per se rule to situations where” a defense lawyer was never admitted to the bar (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • finding customer relationship with 16 FINRA member, despite the claimant’s lack of an account with the member, 17 because the claimant would have had an account with the member but for the 18 fraud asserted in the FINRA arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Calabresi, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.