Skip to main content
C.D. California· 11/14/2011

Hill v. Opus Corp.

Citations

  • 464 B.R. 361
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152705
  • 2011 WL 7092346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that contra proferentem is not applicable to top hat plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Margaret M. Morrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.